And that is one of the many reasons why we have a team.
Well how do you judge a level if you haven't played it. There are more than 2 judges aren't there ? If I was a judge I couldn't possibly give a verdict on a level if I hadn't played it.
Sheriff Sack, potential for episode 32. Played by coxy224 and Morgana25 Be my valentine, potential for episode 34, played by TheAdipose and coxy224 I can't say for certain if more people played them, the tracking system wasn't as effective back then, but both levels got at least 2 plays. Now, seeing as you said you weren't talking about levels for yourself and you said you knew they weren't being played, what exactly am I supposed to think now?
I don't think there is any justification for us setting an arbitrary limit on how difficult levels may be before they are considered "bad". We will not exclude quality levels from the spotlight, just because some players will not be able to cope with them. It is not fair. However, I will raise the question of tagging the spotlighted levels with an indicator of their difficulty level, as I think this would be a useful feature. If you wish to set up your own periodic recommendations thread, for fun, simple levels, aimed at a specific audience then go for it. It can be similar to what amazingflyingpoo does for the PSP. I'm sure there are plenty of members who would appreciate that, as you say. But we will not discriminate in this way in the official spotlight. There is also no sensible method to select levels from outside of LBPC for the spotlight. Any creator who wishes to be considered for a spotlight position may do so by signing up here and creating a thread.
Ok I'll start you off with 2 of mine. How about Sheriff Sack 2 and my 2 player valentine themed level ? By the way the main thing I've complained about with the spolight before is the difficulty of the levels. Ask morgana and she'll confirm that I've asked her several times if we can have a separate spotlight for easy, fun levels becasue all you seem to care about recently are horrendously difficult or weird levels and a lot of people on here would like to play something better than those. It would also be a better idea to do a spotlight of levels from the community out there and not just the showcase levels on here. I know there is a recommendations thread but that doesn't work because it gets buried out of sight with all the new threads that spring up every day. We need it to be stickied like the spotlight so it can be seen easily.
Yes, I'm sure you have. However, I would like to look into the levels that you say didn't get played and apologise to the creators in question if it does turn out that that is the case. Obviously you aren't going to do that for me, but maybe put that aside to get a little bit of justice for them?
**** you you little aresehole I've **** better things than you.
Anyways I used that as an example of where it appears that someone has been smacked down for "questioning the spotlight team", when in actual fact what they were being smacked down for was unfounded accusations presented in a snide manner. No matter how you dress up what you said as a "sarcastic response to luos", the fact of the matter is that you made an accusation against the spotlight team, one of a series of public accusations and libel dating back several months. If you wanted, I could have picked out any of those as great examples, I just happened to pick out this one. As for me being a nasty piece of work.... You may well be right, but the words "Pot", "kettle" and "black" certainly spring to mind
Please let us know of these levels that didn't get played from episode 37. I'm not entirely sure how you could know such a thing, as there isn't the facility in the game to detect this. However, if it does turn out that a level did not get played then I would like to have the opportunity to apologise to the creators, as it would be a the result of a massive error on our part. I refer you back to my original response to when you claimed that some of us don't even warrant plays from the spotlight team: http://www.lbpcentral.com/forums/sho...864#post443864 The way you phrased the statement places yourself amongst the group of people who didn't warrant plays. As I said before, this is a statement that you know to be completely false.
I am not a liar thankyou. Unlike some people I have always been honest throughout my life. The comment you are referring to and twisted to suit yourself was a sarcastic response to Luos because he complained about 'ONLY having 2 levels spotlighted' boo hoo. I said "some of us don't merit plays let alone spotlights". I didn't say a particular level of mine hadn't been played at all but you chose to see it that way simply because you like to take every opportunity to have a go at me as your present attack on me in a thread started by Bloo-boy in which I never even posted anything proves. I could have provided a level that I knew hadn't been played if you had asked but you obviously didn't care enough to do that. I'll expect an apology from you sooner rather than later. Thanks.
