yeah but you'd just have 4 extremely low quality levels since you'd have to be thermo friendly
Printable View
Its been a long time since i did the reasearch but, for some reason i'm certain they have added split screen, sorry, can't remember what source i got that from :(
They have it was announced a few weeks ago I think. :)
If you're playing online you get your own camera like in create mode :p
Isn't that something like "own-screen multiplayer" or something? :confused:
Well if you're not happy with LBP 2, you can still play LBP 1.
As always it's up to the creator. As you can see in the clips of LBP2 (was it the adventure trailer?) there's FOUR furry chickens flying around. It's made for four players. It'll always be up to the creator to screw it up or not.
Just to clear things up, there's no splitscreen.
Believe it or not, it's extremely hard to do on current gen consoles because of graphical limitations and whatnot.
Ok, yea soz, theres no split screen but in online play mode, each player can have their own cam. Thats what i meant, soz for the confusion.
Check the link in my Sig...
What is with the exaggerated title? I've been noticing a lot of that lately. get a freaking grip.
Aside from that, I see your point. At first people will probably make more single player levels than not. But, I imagine that it will be for a couple of reasons; Good Multi-player levels tend to require more planning and forethought. Also, many people play solo when they are learning a new app.
Anyway, I don't think either of those have much to do with the structure of LBP2.
My solution will probably be to place "2p", "3p", or "4p" into the title.
Allowing people to create a single player experience =/= ruining multiplayer gaming
In fact, that doesn't make any sense at all. Why would you ever think that?
its not taking anything away if you want to play a multiplayer you can find them more easy
the game that ruined multiplayer is CoD:MW2... all thosse stupid noobs who'v never played CoD:4 MW
I belive LBP 2 will not ruin the multiplayer. Many people will be on their moon creat new levels, but they will invite their friends. And later, after the level is finished, they'll go online and play community levels.
And at the beginning many people will go online. They want to be happy with everyone else because they've got lbp 2 yey :p
~Karkan
I'm sure they'll be levels for everyone, not just single player or levels with friends. I'd love to see mini-games like seen in videos and such but made by us guys. Just be patient and I'm sure our minds will be full on blown by awesomeness.
@OP:
If I say yes, will you guys stop making all the "LBP2 is evil because (why LBP2's eil)" threads? :p
Not really, I've seen really good levels that don't take 1/4th of the thermo, and A LOT bad quality ones that almost overheat...
Not to mention the fact that they're managing the thermo differently this time around, so this may be easier.
emiters will also not use the thermo of what they're speculated to emit, but only what they emit (for what i heard) so this may bring new ways to cheat the termo as well, or if not, the old method may still work, if that doesn't work either, then we'll probably just find another way to cheat the thermo dude.
Remember that its a good creator's job how to make the best out of their thermo, so I'm sure this won't be a problem if such cases arise. :)
Well say you're browsing levels with some friends. You hope into a level which puts player 1 in a controllinator. Everyone else just sits around at the bottom of the level or leaves.
I can see your guys' point, but making truly single-player levels will be more of an annoyance than anything else.
Another tiny rant about controllinators; people, I don't want to play as your SUPER EMO HIPSTER DEATH character or your FURRY SUPER KAWAII LOL character.
Don't get me wrong, the controllinator is an amazing little device, but I have a bad feeling that a lot of good creators are going to take this the wrong way.
Im pretty sure it wont some people will still add a little of the LBP essence into NO. 2
Lol, don't think so