BG1, PRELOAD BG2, PRELOAD

View Poll Results: Shmoos?

Voters
35. You may not vote on this poll
  • Shmoos for everyone! All will have shmoos!

    20 57.14%
  • Shmoos should only go to the working class!

    1 2.86%
  • Shmoos should be a commercial product.

    1 2.86%
  • Shmoos should only go to the unemployed.

    2 5.71%
  • No one should have Shmoos! Destroy the shmoos!

    8 22.86%
  • I don't know!

    3 8.57%
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3
Results 41 to 45 of 45
  1. #41

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jalr2d2 View Post
    The thing about this is, would people be motivated to work again if they have schmoos? I mean, they might eventually but I guarantee it would be slower. Also, would it replace welfare (I don't know what they have in any country besides America) or would it be an add on. Because, if it was an add on. People could use welfare money on luxuries and schmoos on food. Essentially prospering without doing anything. And if schmoos went to the homeless, would they be taken away as soon as they made a home for the homeless person? Or would they stay? People might then become homeless intentionelly just for a while so they can have a schmoo. Then they can quit their job and get welfare and not do anything. And if they were taken away, would the homeless person then have to pay for electricity and water and other things? Or would they get schmoos again by quitting their job (if they have one) and prosper without doing anything? And if it wasn't an add on, but a replacement, then people still would be able to get a small, short job just so they can buy stuff and have the schmoo take care of everything else.
    And if the scmoo took care of electricity and water would the respective companies be payed by the schmoo (Do they generate money.) or will the schmoo make electricity and water, causing the companies to go bankrupt? And then, if they made money, we would have double or even triple didget inflation and money would soon become worthless. The goverment would have to change currency as the dollar (Or yen or mark or pound) would be worth nothing. Everything would cost so much, you would have to have to carry money in wheelbarrows. The government would probably outlaw schmoos and people would run out of money and we would have the worst depression in history. So I think no one should get schmoos.
    In specific, if given to the poor residing in 3rd world countries, say, Africa, the creatures would greatly benefit the world. Also, once a schmoo had given a set amount of necessary provisions to a family, that ability/those abilities could maybe be restricted/limited/deleted by surgery/drugs so it was incapable of producing another one. If a schmoo had given off enough goods to that family, it would therefore in effect be neutered and would then make a fantastic pet. Everyone wins!

  2. #42
    R2D2 Rocks so hard! jalr2d2's Avatar
    Points: 4,469, Level: 19
    Level completed: 55%, Points required for next Level: 181
    Overall activity: 0%

    PSN
    jalr2d2
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    In your house, eating your toast.
    Posts
    248

    Default

    Because everyone is going to hand in their "everything I need maker" in to be neutralized. It'll go off without a hitch.
    (And yes, I am being the devils advocate.)


  3. #43

    Default

    knowing humanity, they are just gonna kill them all and use there hides for panties.

  4. #44

    Default

    Now this is starting to sound like a Dr. Seuss book.

  5. Thanks!


  6. #45

    Default

    As long as they could be controlled, they could usher in a new era of world peace.

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •